The Real DOPE Project · Research
Two investigations into unequal protection: how AI applies evidence, and whether support remains usable when circumstances change.
Read the arguments, follow the sources and see what still needs to be tested. These are TRDP research publications; neither reports a completed TRDP validation study or peer-review approval.
Evidence review and proposed audit
Can an AI describe harm reduction accurately and still provide less useful help when a person carries a stigmatized label? What studies show, what “inherited” can mean, and how TRDP proposes to test unequal evidence application.
Read AI Inherits Stigma →Conceptual research
A referral, prescription or service listing is only a starting point. This proposed framework asks whether protective functions remain available, usable and connected before, during and after a transition.
Read Safety Continuity →Earlier research note
Our October research note on universal safety education and the outcomes that would need to be evaluated.
Read the public-safety proposition →Was this resource useful? Honest feedback, including what didn’t work, helps TRDP improve. Safety information is always available whether you respond or skip.